By Kurt Hofmann, examiner.com
St. Louis area readers will most likely remember the lethal rampage almost two years ago at a Kirkwood City Coucnil meeting. The shooting, by Charles Lee “Cookie” Thortnon–who seemed to have borne a more or less perpetual series of grievances against the City Council, claimed five victims immediately (plus Thornton, who was killed by police), and Mayor Mike Swoboda, who died several months later as a result of his wounds.
What brings this up again now is the fact that an unarmed security guard has been named in a lawsuit for failing to stop the killer.
An attorney for the daugher of one of the victims seems to claim that the guard, Ronald L. Whitehead, should have taken Thornton’s angry relationship with the City Council into consideration, and based on that consideration, apparently should have prevented Thornton from entering . . . somehow (this was after Thornton had already killed a police officer in the parking lot, and taken his gun).
When Thornton first arrived outside, Mr. Whitehead did go upstairs and alert the police officer providing secuity inside (that officer was also killed later in the rampage). Beyond that, what would the plaintiffs have had Mr. Whitehead do?
While I certainly can understand having some doubts about the efficacy of unarmed “security,” the City Council, presumably, knew that Mr.
Whitehead was unarmed when they hired the services of the secuity company (Whelan Security) for which he worked.
Is Mr. Whitehead being sued, in effect, for being unarmed? If so, that would seem to have the potential to have an interesting effect on the “guns at work” debate.
![]()
Recent Posts
- Experts: Prepare Companies For Workplace Violence
- Workplace Violence: "Snapped: Were there warning signs?"
- What Can Be Done to Protect Nurses from Workplace Violence?
- Symposium kicks off program urging people to Choose Civility
- Down economy means rise in workplace violence threat

Workplace Connecting the Dots: Information Sharing to Prevent Violence
Coming into force on June 15, 2010, Bill 168 requires every employer in Ontario with more than five workers to develop a violence risk assessment and implementing a policy and program to prevent and manage workplace violence and harassment. This half day Gowling’s seminar will provide a detailed legal analysis of Bill 168 and outline a practical plan for compliance.
The Bully at Work: What You Can Do to Stop the Hurt and Reclaim Your Dignity on the Job
No Comment