«

»

Oct 01 2012

Print this Post

Workplace violence often preceded by red flags

By Lindsey Seavert

Workplace violence isn’t sudden, and shooters don’t just snap, according to Dr. Kristine Kienlen, a forensic psychologist who says the tragedies typically have warning signs that need to be reported.

Kienlen says most likely, red flags may have been noticed before Andrew Engeldinger opened fire at his workplace, Accent Signage Systems in Minneapolis Thursday night, killing five people before himself.

“Often people comment that when these incidents happen, when homicides happen, people just snap. It happens suddenly, there is no way to predict it or prevent it, and what we have learned in the threat assessment field, that is not true,” she said.

She specializes in assessing the risk of violence in workplaces and schools, what’s known as threat assessment, what she calls an emerging field. She started Minnesota Threat Assessment and Forensic Professionals five years ago and offers forensic psychological evaluations, taking reports on potentially violent people in companies or at colleges.

Kienlen says the pathway to violence is usually triggered by a grievance or grudge, some sort of perceived wrong, whether someone lost a promotion or their job.

Kienlen is one of the few threat assessment experts in Minnesota, along with detective Sergeant Randy McAlister from Cottage Grove Police Department. He says he studies the emerging field because policing can often be reactive, and threat assessment allows officers to be proactive when detecting violence.

“It follows a pathway, usually there are red flags, the key is getting the position to recognize those red flags and to observe them,” said Sgt. McAlister.

Kienlen says warning signs that follow include isolation, threats, bizarre behavior, talking about violence or suicide, assaults or property destruction. It can also include strange cyber activity, losing a temper, bringing weapons to work, or bullying.

She tells employers to proactively develop a clear workplace violence prevention policy, where people feel comfortable reporting concerns to their boss or even police.

“By having a place where the warning signs are reported and the dots can be connected. Kind of since 9-11, people see something at the airport and they report it, we need to have that attitude in the workplace,” said Kienlen, who says it’s possible to intervene anywhere on the “pathway” to violence.

“Obviously we try to leverage our resources from the law enforcement side with probation, community and mental health services,” said Sgt. McAlister.

Other early inventions include counseling for workers in crisis, or sessions for employees to talk about their grievances. Kienlen and McAlister want to shed hope that tools like threat assessment can offer a safety net for the senseless.

“I know specific cases, I know the steps we have taken have prevented homicides,” said McAlister.

Source: Kare11.com





What Every Target of Workplace Bullying Needs to Know
Are You a Target of Workplace Bullying?

Download: What Every Target of Workplace Bullying Needs to Know.
Learn how to avoid the traps, stop bullies in their tracks and get your life back!

More Information: OvercomeBullying.org

Permanent link to this article: http://workplaceviolencenews.com/2012/10/01/workplace-violence-often-preceded-by-red-flags/

1 comment

  1. Felix P. Nater, CSC

    Great article! Great philosophy! Great attitude! Threat Assessment and Combating Workplace Violence are essential to an prevention initiative. Employee training without the early warning benefits of a Threat Assessment or Incident Management is not effective. Threat Assessment makes Combating Workplace Violence the critical component that gives the initiative credibility. Dr. Kristin Kienlen’s philosophy is spot on as it relates to the value of the Threat Assessment or Incident Management.

    Dr. Kienlen’s philosophy is consistent with sound approaches to Combating Workplace Violence. Most incidents of workplace violence emanate from workplace settings, and other contributing factors that include both exposure to perceived or real issues and the role of the workplace in failing to take corrective action. Employees who commit the act of homicidal violence have proceeded through a methodical escalation process that prepares them to execute their plan. Dr. Kienlen suggests and validates that proactive workplaces can avert the homicidal act of violence. I agree that organizations that use the Threat Assessment concept as part of prevention can help identify at risk employees & situations on the way to taking appropriate corrective measures.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.